Opinion: Neat technical details, neat truck, but I don’t know if I could get over virtual headlight controls.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because this isn’t 1984 anymore and turbo technology isn’t some new fangled thing. This particular turbo 4 is extremely robust and has gobs of torque down low. Lower than most V8s which is exactly what you need for towing. Plus when you aren’t carrying a heavy load or deep into the boost, you should see fuel economy that is considerably better than what a larger engine would typically get.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I totally agree that modern turbo 4s can be impressive engines,. But I expect you will need to be in boost a lot more often to move such a large vehicle with big tires. The MPG for this truck is 17 city and 19 highway, which is not great for a midsize. This would indicate to me that the weight and large tires are going to be keeping the engine in boost more often.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Boost is not an on/off switch. The difference between full boost and full power, versus partial boost and far better fuel economy is rather huge. And a vehicle is usually (near) idling along at lower RPMs and only using a fraction of its total torque the vast, vast majority of its time. Takes only roughly 20 HP to main speed on a highway.

        • dan1101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet this trucks MPG numbers do not reflect any of that. Aside from that what would the advantage of the turbo 4 be?