• 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      No there shouldn’t, it would be an absolute shit show as to who decides what’s on the test and what the correct answers are.

      The best is mandatory voting, making voting day a national holiday, and universal mail-in voting. The problem is people thinking their voice doesn’t matter because of gerrymandering, the electoral college, and 2 senators per state.

    • LethalSmack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem with that is who gets to decide what is on that test.

      If it’s done in good faith then all is well. When it’s weaponized to prevent those with opposing opinions from voting then it’s a major problem

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Then we may as well restrict impoverished groups of people who can’t get a good enough education from voting. Since they don’t vote, we should just pull even move funding from them. We should also make them work for their basic sustenances since they can’t contribute anything else. Let’s even quarantine them to certain areas to make sure they don’t put too much strain on our society. Without them having a voice, only working for basic necessities, and being confined, we should just call them slaves.