• jochem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s bought by Avast. I immediately uninstalled it when I learned about the news. No way that they don’t want get a return on investment by e.g. selling your data.

    Consent-o-matic is better (actually sets the minimum amount of cookies) and is developed by university employees, whom I trust more.

  • Racle@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    IIRC, that doesn’t block cookies, it just blocks cookie warnings.

    I personally use Consent-O-Matic nowdays.

    I don't care about cookies sometimes broke website.

    Never had that issue with Consent-O-Matic which automatically rejects all cookies while still making site usable.

    • Gamey@feddit.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I definitely have to check that out, is it another one of those “we can’t reject consistant enough so we will just accept half of the banners” tho?

      • Racle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t accept banners / popups. When that doesn’t know how to handle things, it just leave it to user to handle.

        Most of the time it just works as intended.

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    uBlock Origin has filters to block cookie pop-ups. I consider the extension a must anyway, no need to download another one like IDCAC or Consent-o-matic

  • Gamey@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t that just accept most cookie banners? Sounds like a horrible idea to me unless you auto clear cookies all the time!

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions

      `Cookie extensions

      ❗️Sanitizing in-session is a false sense of privacy. They do nothing for IP tracking. Even Tor Browser does not sanitize in-session e.g. when you request a new circuit. A new ID requires both full sanitizing and a new IP. The same applies to Firefox
      ❗️Cookie extensions can lack APIs or implementation of them to properly sanitize
          e.g. at the time of writing: Cookie Auto Delete` 
      
      • pipes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true but if you open tens of websites as many people do every day (some keep them open for months!), what kind of monstrous VPN setup should you have to have tens of IPs?

        I don’t think there’s a realistic solution other than using TOR as much as you can bear…

        CookieAutoDelete and Temporary Containers fool 99% of websites and trackers, especially with uBlock Origin it’s the best you can get without losing convenience…IMHO

    • pipes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But all the incognito tabs share the same “container”, if you keep a lot of tabs open like me, try the Temporary Container extension with automatic mode. Also CookieAutodelete on Auto (it deletes cookies and local storage after a tab is closed for e.g. 15s)