… At this time, the most widely used languages that meet all three properties are C and C++, which are not memory safe programming languages. Rust, one example of a memory safe programming language, has the three requisite properties above, but has not yet been proven in space systems. …

  • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    If you’re unable to understand what I’ve written here, then just say that. There’s no need to be accusatory because what I’ve stated is contrary to your claim.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your first sentence alone is a convoluted mess. My entire point is that the SSA website inexplicably has operating hours. Those hours are posted on their website. That’s all.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        My entire point is that the SSA website inexplicably has operating hours. Those hours are posted on their website. That’s all.

        Yes, but that has little to do with your initial claim which is my point.
        Additionally, the White House does not control social security services.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please feel free to reread my initial comment, in which I refer to the US government in general, which would encompass both the SSA and the White House.

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Your point is void as the US government is not a single massive entity you can generalize. They’re are a plethora of different, separated branches, departments and offices each operating independently with their own unique functions, values, regulations, practices, etc.

            All you’ve done here is presented a hyper-generalized claim as if all of the government enforces and endorses this practices while providing a single cherry picked counterexample without even knowing the actual reason why they use this practice to begin with or providing evidence of them endorsing the practice despite me asking you to do so.

            The fact of the matter is the vast majority of US government entities do not have any such practice and there’s no evidence of your provided counterexample actually endorsing others to do the same let alone any other branches or departments. If you have evidence, I again ask you to provide it.

            Metaphorically speaking, this is like judging a library’s entire collection based on a single book. Just as a library houses a multitude of books with different themes and purposes, the government comprises diverse entities with unique practices and reasons for their operational procedures. Making sweeping generalizations without considering the individual nuances of each entity is like judging an entire library by a single book on its shelf.