• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Your first attempt at proving it failed spectacularly, so you’re just moving on to the next thing, which is rather disappointing.

    It didn’t fail. It hit the mark. I can cite other things but you’ll continue to act in bad faith. You make things up then when asked to back up your claim. You hurl insults. When you are corrected, you hurl insults. So I’ll leave it at that.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It didn’t fail. It hit the mark.

      Then perhaps you didn’t read what I said:

      “Majority of democrats pressure singular democrat over widely misunderstood phrase” equates to democrats celebrating murder? What a joke.

      • Pointing to a single democrat does not represent all democrats

      • The article itself states that she is in the minority position, even amongst democrats, further making her a bad representation of democrats on this issue

      • “Defund the police” is widely misunderstood as a phrase

      • Even if she literally meant “no police should exist” instead of the much more common meaning, that statement is not a celebration of crime or murder

      you’ll continue to act in bad faith.

      I came in here with an actual argument, that democrats are trying to reduce deaths, and you immediately called me an edge lord. If anyone is acting in bad faith here it is you.

      You hurl insults. When you are corrected, you hurl insults. So I’ll leave it at that.

      I havent insulted you. To quote a non insult, “You’re an edgelord. It’s what you are doing. You didn’t question a thing. You went full edge lord.”

      Don’t want me saying these things? Maybe you should behave yourself. Don’t insult me and I won’t insult you. It’s not that hard winter.