• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because they hire cheap developers who don’t know what the fuck they are doing?

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is very possible to know exactly what should be done, but not have the time available to achieve it.

      • xia@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would sooner blame the management, that would even think of excluding “untested” or “unsupported” browsers, like some kind of technofacist dictator, instead of choosing a helpful “if you’re having problems with our shit site, use chrome” message… or even literally doing nothing… everything is broken these days, and a half-functional site is better than an intentionally-broken one.

        • rustymitt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The tools and knowledge exist to make building standards compliant web applications just as easy, if not easier, than chrome-only web applications. It’s not the responsibility of management to use those tools or acquire that knowledge.

          Unless you’re using some fancy WebGPU shit. I don’t think we’re talking about some fancy WebGPU shit.