• Zoolander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is false. “Pay for it” or “Pirate it” are not the only 2 options available.

    What are the other options then?

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not to consume it at all, obviously.

      Your measurement for converting potential revenue into loss hinges on those being the only 2 options.

      • Zoolander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have pointed that out as a possibility. Not consuming it at all, though, is not theft precisely because the person isn’t consuming it.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          In which case piracy only accounts for lost revenue if and only if the pirate would have 100%, guaranteed, purchased the content if a pirates copy was not available. So your calculation does not work.

          • Zoolander@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            if a pirates copy was not available.

            This is exactly why my calculation does work. If a pirated copy was not available, they wouldn’t be able to consume the media without paying for it.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              But they also wouldn’t have to pay for it. Which is the only way your calculation would work.