People like to say that bitcoiners are speculators, gamblers etc. But what is not owning Bitcoin?

It’s betting that fiat money, a system devised by bankers and politicians for their own benefit, it the superior form of money, and that it will win on a free market of currencies.

I’m sure somebody will reply hurr durr, I don’t own fiat, I own stocks, property, things that yield returns, yadda yadda. Well guess what, then you already don’t trust fiat money.

  • 0x0F@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    01·
    1 year ago

    Sorry for swingingkoala, i promise we’re not all this unhelpful x3

    Never said you need ASIC, just said that bitcoin is not democratic, because the average Joe does not participate in mining.

    Not quite, as the network is governed by the participating nodes, not just the nodes with miners attached to them. You can produce all the blocks you want, but if they dont comply with the rules they wont be accepted. A good article explaining governance is here.

    There are many countries, where bitcoin use maybe could be used as an alternative to “dollarization”. Yet the only time I actually saw it happening was during the Ukraine invasion, when Russians traded roubles to bitcoin after leaving the country, since their currency more or less collapsed in the international market.

    Theres a couple projects that aim to create a circular bitcoin economy, like Bitcoin Ekasi in South Africa, Bitcoin Beach in El Salvador. Theres also miners supporting local energy development like Gridless.

    It uses 0.2% of energy and still does not facilitate daily trade. While the whole banking sector (ATMs, banks, cyrrency production, datacenters) use around 0.4% of global energy.

    If by “daily trade” you mean daily purchases like coffee, then yeah, the base layer isnt the best for that. Thats the task of the Lightning network, which allows for near-instant settlement with much lower fees compared to the base layer. The base layer is closer to wire transfers or cash than Visa.

    Take VISA for example, it does around 24k transactions per second, while bitcoin does around 100. That’s 240 times more. By this it looks that you would need half the worlds energy production just to come closer to daily use as a currency

    100 is a big overestimation, i think base layer TPS is 7-12? Which is why Lightning exists, because who wants to wait an unknown amount of time before their coffee payment goes through (and spend almost a dollar in fees at minimum)?

    Also, transaction count doesnt equate to energy usage. Whether theres 100 transactions or 1,000,000, the network will use the same amount to process them. The energy usage depends on the number of active ASICs, and on the number of nodes in the network.