It’s been described as a bombshell moment. The upper echelons of Sweden’s government and defence forces last week shocked the nation by explicitly warning that war might come to Sweden, and that each and every Swede should prepare themselves. While some have taken the warning seriously and flocked to the stores to stock up on fuel and survival kits, others have accused the country’s leaders of fear-mongering

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    You should actually always be prepared for things like that. My government says people should keep enough things for two weeks, just in case. It’s good advice. You never know when some manic dictator launches a multi-front blitzkrieg he can’t win, but will devastate the whole region

    • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The two weeks preparedness have been around for a long time in Sweden. It is far from what this issue is about. One of the issues was the goverment’s focus on that you should be prepared to die in war. Sure, it is true that you as a Swedish citizen may have to put you life on the line in case of war. But them focusing on that you should be prepared to die just framed it as if war is coming definetly and soon. The second issue is that the current government is obsessed with fearmongering about immigrants. One of the big points they made was that people who have immigrated and earned their citizenship will not be as willing to protect the country in case of war. I read a title of an article today that said experts have critiqued this statement and said it may actually be the other way around.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I read a title of an article today that said experts have critiqued this statement and said it may actually be the other way around

        Makes sense, they’re the ones who had to work for it.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, it’s because there can always be a power outtage or they have to shutdown the water mains or in my country more likely a flood. All of those are agazillion times more likely than a war, but still reason enough to at least have some supplies.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s the logic in two weeks of provisions? Day 15 sounds like it would be just as much of a shit show as days 1-14.

      • legofreak@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just holding out until more organised help can arrive or your government takes over. This is also in general good advice in case of say natural disasters. Roads may be flooded, areas covered in snow or electricity is out for a few days. Having enough canned food, water, maybe some firewood or alternative means of cooking will come in useful in these circumstances.

        • taladar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, technically there is a hard upper limit at the point where the first necessary nutrient isn’t available in the form of some food (or pill,…) that lasts that long I suppose.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’d call that more if a soft limit as I doubt its definable that far in the future.