I didn’t argue that he was not a corpse, in fact, to argue that Christ did not have a corpse is a heresy, so anyone who says that is dumb and heretic, if, of course, is a christian.
I merely argue that Christ didn’t ressurected in 3 days but in the 3rd day. It’s a common error to say that and totally excusable for a non-christian, yet, it’s wrong.
I’m not sure if English is your second language, but I cannot understand what you are trying to say. No matter what you are trying to say, he was a corpse. Are you trying to say he was a corpse for 2 days and not 3? Maybe 2.5 days? If so, then yeah, sure.
It was actually little more than a day. He died at 3pm on Friday and was resurrected early on Sunday. Again, is a common mistake to say that was three days, but it’s still wrong.
I didn’t argue that he was not a corpse, in fact, to argue that Christ did not have a corpse is a heresy, so anyone who says that is dumb and heretic, if, of course, is a christian.
I merely argue that Christ didn’t ressurected in 3 days but in the 3rd day. It’s a common error to say that and totally excusable for a non-christian, yet, it’s wrong.
I’m not sure if English is your second language, but I cannot understand what you are trying to say. No matter what you are trying to say, he was a corpse. Are you trying to say he was a corpse for 2 days and not 3? Maybe 2.5 days? If so, then yeah, sure.
It was actually little more than a day. He died at 3pm on Friday and was resurrected early on Sunday. Again, is a common mistake to say that was three days, but it’s still wrong.