Ok, you don’t trust the CDC because of the USA’s war on drugs policies/funding. Fair enough. Here’s information from only non-USA health organizations:

https://www.who.int/activities/protecting-people-from-tobacco-smoke

https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-burden-of-cancer/second-hand-smoke

https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2022.020

https://www.health.gov.au/topics/smoking-vaping-and-tobacco/about-smoking/passive-smoking

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/smoking-tobacco/health-effects-smoking-second-hand-smoke/second-hand-smoke.html

https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/quit-smoking/passive-smoking-protect-your-family-and-friends/

Should I find more, or is World Health Organization, EU and the governments of China, Australia, Canada, and the UK enough? All of these organizations agree that second hand smoke is harmful.

I’m not being self-righteous, I’m saying you don’t have the right to hurt other people. I understand that your argument is that second hand smoke doesn’t hurt other people, so I assume you would agree that you don’t have the right to hurt other people (but maybe you wouldn’t agree, idk). Now we’re just determining who’s right, you and the tobacco industry, or every science-based health administration and organization in the world and the general consensus of the medical community.

If you ultimately do agree that second hand smoke is harmful to others, you’ll have to decide if you want to update your belief that these laws shouldn’t be passed and maybe start smoking further away from people, or if you want to change your morality to say you have the right to hurt other people.

You can also do nothing, ignore all of the evidence I’ve presented to you, and just try not to suffer from too much cognitive dissonance.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod