Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Then feel free to go to threads or somewhere that does federate with them. You don’t have to stay on a particular instance if they don’t federate with something you want to engage with.

      That’s your freedom of choice.

      • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        There is no plan for kbin to defederate with Threads, which is why I’m here you dolt. Maybe you should leave.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Makes sense, Kbin is one of the most lax instances when it comes to moderation and defederation, and that’s why they’re considered so bad when it comes to spam and illegal content.

          • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I like the freedom of kbin but also maintain an account on Beehaw because they are the complete opposite with frustratingly strict moderation to the point of moderators telling people to check their naughty language at the door (which is totally understandable).

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              However the serious problem with Kbin’s very lax approach is that it invites some really nasty people who will exploit it. I heard an admin say that a majority of the spam and CSAM attacks have come either from kbin.social or other kbin instances, and at the time it was made worse by a bug that prevented mod actions from federating from kbin, meaning the content stays up even after moderated on its home server. It wasn’t great.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Then you’re evil. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      Go ahead, be evil. It is certainly your prerogative.

      Edit: just look at how many votes “But what if some of us don’t care if they’re evil?” got. Like, what a wild-ass bullshit thing to say. This thread is definitely being astroturfed.

      • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve noticed a lot of turfing on all of these threadsfed posts. It’s becoming more and more. People just need to get a threads account if it’s so important to them.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well they’re clearly aware of us, we can’t pretend we’re just a bunch of silly little beans doing our own thing anymore. Of course they’re going to do this. There is literally not a single reason for them not to.

              • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Sad but true. I think the only way anything could ever be restored to the bygone tangible days of the Internet would be to destroy Meta, fully.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, but the reason we need federation in the first place is because of the relentless onslaught of monopoly.

              I think this is a good prpblem to have. The fediverse gets to test itself against the largest established social media network, and honestly I don’t see a way for them to win. You can ses it in these replies - they are scared of this boycott. Even more exciting now that I think of if - this isn’t a consumer boycott like we’re used to. This is a boycott by the producers. The instances create the network, so their voices are much more important.

              • 2deck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                It is exciting. I’ve been impressed by the response to this. Reading between the astroturfing, there’s a community with a sense of purpose here.

                Thanks to all who are here genuinely!

              • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m old enough to know better than be excited. I haven’t seen a single good community have staying power in the time of the entire internet. And it’s only getting worse. Especially when a billion dollar tumor takes interest in where you’re at.

                What I do find interesting and alarming is how aggressive Meta is in seeking out the small inconsequential pockets of the Internet and crushing them. They’re so deadset on fuxing any collective not being monitored by their government backed all seeing eye. It will be interesting to see how a federated social network holds up but I wouldn’t assume they don’t already have at least five game plans to crush it.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        We should have rules against turfing like this in the community, and remove or ban people suspected of it. I get the benefits of having a neutral place but at the same time we don’t allow advertising here so why should suspected astroturfing be any different.

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s sarcasm. I upvoted them because I would have said something similar to highlight the absurdity of any argument against defederating with Threads.

      • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Thanks, it is my prerogative.

        This is the point of the freedom of federated communities: we can read whatever the fuck we want from wherever the fuck we want without having authoritarian censor-heavy limp-wrist adult-baby moderators and corporate fascists determining what we are allowed to read or affiliate with.

        The freedom to read both sides and control what I want to interact with on my own will, and make my own decisions is why I’m fucking here. I don’t want people like you making decisions for me, go fuck yourself.

        Thanks for noticing I’m evil. I’ll go make a nice blood sacrifice to my effigy of Satan by eating another baby.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Right, so nobody’s stopping you from joining threads, or making your own instance. You can call it evil.villain. Why don’t you?

        • Dieinahole@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So when they steamroll this place so hard you only get their side of the story, what then?

          • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I promise you nothing is going to get steamrolled, you are simply being very ignorant.

            In fact, I will @ you with a reminder in 30 days as a reply to this message of how mundane and routine everything is to prove you are wrong.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Then get fucked?

      Meta are largely responsible for the current state of affairs right now. Nearly every current war, genocide, fake news, and more can be tied back to Meta.

      • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you seriously simplifying all current conflicts caused down to simply social media? So if we completely remove all social media, humanity instantly becomes the utopian society from science fiction. STFU with this stupidity you ignorant child.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Simply? No.

          Dangerously and deliberately engageful? Yes.

          Look at the impact of FB in the Rohingya genocide for fucks sake.

          Fucking right wing wanker.