More insurance companies are fleeing the state because of the growing threat from natural disasters.

    • Anomandaris@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s fine, but what happens when this expands with the the increasing effects of climate change? What happens when Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas health insurance costs triple because of the risks of extreme heat? What about New Orleans or locations prone to extreme storms or hurricanes?

      Huge patches of countries all over the world are soon to become uninsurable because climate change makes it too dangerous to live there.

      • masterspace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. People gonna have to move.

        Remember when people said that climate change would cost us trillions of dollars? This is why.

          • Jaysyn@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’d be easier & cheaper to fix this one.

            We’re going to have to break a few eggs though, since we waited so long.

            By eggs I mean multinational corporations.

            • Captain_Ender@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some scientists theorize we’ve already passed the red line. The rest is just crowd control. Those eggs are gonna be broken but they’re probably gonna be a few billion people. Best to plan for the worst, hope for the best and doing both climate science and technical advances towards colonization.

              It’s not like the research and funding needs to go to one or the other. Never understood that argument, like what 10,000s of astrophysicists and engineers are just gonna be like “yeah let’s all stop or research today to save humanity” lmao.

              • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Colonizing other planets is not a solution. It is vastly harder to terraform Mars than to repair the damage we’ve done to Earth. Multiple technological Holy Grails must be discovered in order to make it even remotely possible. Not happening.

                A colony established on Mars with current technology would be completely dependent on Earth for food and other supplies.

                If we’ve passed the red line already, then it’s all over and we may as well live it up while we still can.

        • HipHoboHarold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it’s gonna suck for most of us in a lot of ways. Like I moved up north partially because of politics back in 2014. Now some are eventually gonna follow and move up here as well. Plus, I can’t afford a house. A lot of people can’t afford one. But when more and more people come, we won’t have enough. Unless we see some real, meaningful changes in the way we handle housing, it’s gonna be a shit show.

          I was talking to my mom back in I think 2020 and the subject of the cost of a home came up. I told her how much they are here, and she said me and my boyfriend should move near her and some other family in St Louis. While I would love to be near family, I’m gay. I’m not moving to a red state. And I’m not looking to buy a house I will eventually need to abandon with no one buying it. That’s a lot of money to just lose.

          • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            A house is worth peanuts without water, this should be priority number one when purchasing a house. We should avoid cities and move closer to mountains where the rain will provide enough stream.

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Plenty of cities have good access to water. It’s why most of them were built where they were in the first place. And for the most part, it’s the way you have the least impact on the environment.

              • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Plenty of cities have good access to water. It’s why most of them were built where they were in the first place.

                That’s the way it used to be.

                Take the Rio Grande:

                Water restrictions ordered in Rio Grande Valley as drought persists

                ‘The actual lake is gone,’ Zapata County judge says

                McALLEN, Texas (Border Report) — The two largest cities in the Rio Grande Valley have implemented mandatory water restrictions as water levels in two reservoirs hit near-record lows due to an ongoing drought.

                Rathmell gave Border Report a tour of diminishing Falcon Lake on Thursday, and at the time advocated that cities downstream in the Rio Grande Valley should be forced to conserve water.

                Rathmell said that Falcon Lake is basically no more. It’s just an area where the Rio Grande river runs through.

                Cities will become traps. It was convenient before but now it is becoming a death trap, don’t purchase a house there, you become dependent on someone bringing food and water to you. If you are in the business of searching for a house, avoid cities.

                • ampersandrew@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re cherry picking your examples. Most cities still do have great access to water. And that “dependence” is called civilization. Everyone has their own jobs to do so that we’re not all each our own homestead living off grid. It’s more efficient and resilient that way.

      • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We say goodbye to our quality of life.

        Pensions are a result of our capacity to produce wealth, but as the cost of life will rise those pensions will be slowly erased. You’d better spare money as young as possible. The climate is guaranteed to get warmer for at least 20 years, whatever we do now. Based on the fact that we are not doing anything anyway you can safely bet on a constant raise of temperature for 40 years. So your pension will be your life savings.

        Arizona and the region of the lake Mead will probably stop honoring the laws about water, you know, a state cannot confiscate all the water for himself yadayada

        The importance of being vegan in one picture. But by now it’s too late anyway.