downhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months agothis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down111
arrow-up1594arrow-down1imagethis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialdownhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareKidplayer_666@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·11 months agoAlso, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
minus-squareTonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agowhat about the number whose square is -1
minus-squarenomecks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·11 months agoRoses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoas far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.) what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
minus-square⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-217 days agodeleted by creator
Also, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You’re just imagining it
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
deleted by creator