It sucks.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing about alternatives is you need to use them to build content. It’s a catch 22 for sure, but the answer isn’t just give in.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        How do content creators make money on these alternatives? It’s a noble idea to get away from big corp, but someone has to foot that bill, so it’s either ads or subs. Nobody had a platform that rivals YT except for probably PH, and that’s not a real option.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It seems to me that most content creators make their money off things like patreon or selling merch, neither of which particularly ties them to Youtube.

        • Bizarroland@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think a lot of them rely on Patreon, probably building their audiences on larger platforms and then veering off and taking their diehard fans with them, but I don’t know of anyone that has been very successful doing that who isn’t in the ragebait politics sector, and they all still use youtube if they can.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          By all means, you have content from a creator you like you want to consume that’s your deal. At the same time I believe youtube itself had done lots of disservice to the creators themselves but you’re free to explore that rabbit hole.

          End of the day you accept its ads or subs for the content you want. Me personally would rather chew nails then consume what youtube is pushing but you do you.