There are some… interesting things in this list.

    • lightnegative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a good thing.

      It sounds bad on the surface but what constitutes hate speech is completely subjective so impossible to define in a legal sense without also affecting freedom of speech.

      Plus we already have laws against inciting violence etc so it’s not like there’s a gaping hole

      • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So then fix it. Or change it, or rework it. Don’t just cut cut cut because things aren’t perfect. How is society supposed to progress if we kill any ambitious programmes?

        • lightnegative@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this case the premise is fundamentally flawed and can’t really be fixed.

          Therefore, it’s logical to stop wasting time on it and spend the time on the new priorities instead

          • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I disagree the premise is flawed. We, as a society, have decided hate-speech is not ok.