• RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me get this straight. Valve decides to break into a market with a niche product few people have purchased from other vendors in the past (GPD, Aya, etc), says “we want this to be affordable and just work”, releases a 1.0 to test the waters, and you think their initial device should have had OLED?

      I can see why you don’t run any companies.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was led, imo more than good enough for my use, and I don’t have to worry about burn in.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah thanks, I’ll try to remember this going forward.

          Alas I’ve already forgotten, old man brain syndrome. Crystal display not diode.

      • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was a poor quality lcd panel and burn in hasn’t been an issue on oleds for years now ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • Schmuppes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still don’t get the fuss about OLED. As someone who prefers relatively low brightness and contrast settings on most displays that are not used in the summer sun, I’ve never felt like decent non-OLED panels were lacking for me.