Google decides to delete any account that has two years of inactivity. See how they decide to go about it.
I hope this doesn’t mean they will be opening up the email addresses for use after they delete/clear them
I think that would be a security nightmare, so they probably won’t (and they’ll probably be forced to not do it if they try)
Exception for YouTube Video Posters:
Notably, any account that has posted one or more videos on YouTube will be exempt from the account purge, regardless of the period of inactivity. This exception ensures that users who have contributed content to the platform will not lose their accounts.
an inactive Google account is one that has not been used for a continuous period of two years. Google defines “activity” as actions such as signing in to read or send emails, using Google Drive, watching YouTube videos, sharing photos, or downloading apps.
That feels okay to me?
It is, though 2 years is a little short. I just got back into my very first Yahoo e-mail not long ago and that wouldn’t have been possible with a policy like this.
But, they have so many that have been stagnant for so long so I’m not really faulting them for this particular move.
Microsoft killed off my pre-MS Hotmail account years back. Google’s got lots of company with the 2 years rule.
Signing in to what, though?
I have one account that only ever gets used via a third party email client. When I check my email, am I “signing in” by Google’s definition or not?
Oof. What do I do with all those websites referring to my other gmail account I never use… I don’t want my main gmail to receive these messages.
Sign into it at least once a year.
So. Years back. When they did that ad where parents sent a kid emails to their own Gmail and then gave them the account details when they were grown up… Everyone who ever did that are gonna lose all their work if they don’t think to log in periodically. Nice.
I thought they had already done it. I got the notification months ago.
yes, they did, but the actual pruning starts from december.
It’s not the first time. Besides, they won’t even let you log into old accounts that don’t have recovery emails and real names set. I lost a couple of really good usernames from the beta era after they rolled out all of their account protection practices. A password isn’t good enough for Google.
They can leverage these terms if they want to. For example you’re also only allowed to have one account per person.
Wasn’t it the Terraria dev who got his account locked and they used that as an excuse as to why he was locked out of his account? They said he had too many accounts or something?
They can enforce arbitrary rules when they need to if they wanna fuck you over; just like cops.
They’ve got a “real names” rule?
They haven’t applied it against the online pseudonyms I’ve been using for the past 30 years. Thankfully.
They wouldn’t let me log into a couple of accounts despite having the password, saying that I hadn’t used it for awhile and they couldn’t verify I was the account owner. Since there was no recovery email set, which was intentional because it was supposed to be an anonymous account, and none of the other information I set was real, they said they can’t verify me and won’t let me log in. They’re pretty insistent that passwords alone aren’t acceptable, even when you use all of your real information. Go try to log into Google on a new device from a new location and see what a huge PITA it is.
Ah; that explains it; I have multiple accounts cross-linked as recovery accounts. Sounds like I’ll be fine as long as I don’t run afoul of their “inactive” rules.
It was disappointing. I had
uber1337and lost it due to them refusing to let me log back in. That name doesn’t mean much now, but it was pretty l33t back then.Edit: I guess it’s actually a pretty stupid name now that there’s a taxi company named Uber. Cool, I just made peace with losing that account. Haha!
Stop threatening me with a good time.
