Move fast and break things.
Merge vulnerabilities.
Double the work.
Merge code without tests.
Anything, but don’t let code become stale.

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    196
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having a hard time determining whether this is sarcasm or not. Then I see the phrase “JavaScript Engineer” and become doubly confused.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I distinguish four types. There are clever, hardworking, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and hardworking; their place is the General Staff. The next ones are stupid and lazy; they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the mental clarity and strength of nerve necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is both stupid and hardworking; he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always only cause damage.

        – Kurt von Hammerstein

        LinkedIn is Facebook for that last type.

        • terrrmus@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linkedin is for lunatics. Just a bunch of goobers giving digital handjobs to each other.

        • RonSijm@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think so. I just made a screenshot of one random convo he’s having about this, but there’s loads more in a similar fashion.

          And all of his other posts besides this one seem legit on the surface.

          So it would be pretty weird if he randomly has a very bad take, and then just claims “Lol this was a troll post, gotcha!”… That’s pretty much the 4chan defense when you get called out - “Haha guys, I’m actually not r-worded, I’m just trolling!”

      • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow, of course he’s pretending the response is a misrepresentation of his opinion instead of defending it in good faith.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having to go through the process of merging hurts morale and slows performance. Give everyone on your team the right to force push to master.

  • sirdorius@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really wish LinkedIn would add an anonymous cringe emoji. I would use it on like 90% of the content on that site.

      • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me too, it was glorious that time someone accidentally pushed on a Friday evening and stopped production lines for the following week.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What does “stale code” even mean in this context?

    Does that mean it falls behind stable? Just merge stable into your branch; problem solved.

    Or is this just some coded language for “people aren’t adopting my ideas fast enough”. Stop bitching and get good.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amateur. You want real performance? Code in prod. Literally could not be better for collaboration to have the whole team working directly from production servers. Best part? You get INSTANT feedback.

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    My old boss (at a sturtup with some ten ppl) loved to do this. When you’re done with your work, merge to master. Boss-man would then revert the commits if he didn’t like the result. Since the branches all were merged, no-one knew what was actually in prod. Fun times.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why review at all when the users will do this for you? Merge, deploy and move on. If it’s broken they’ll tell you.

      I’m definitely going to start doing this at work. We don’t want our embedded firmware for medical devices to get stale.

  • debil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dunno but xtreme programming sounds like something straight outta Musk’s wettest teenage day dreams.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine if you will: You have a red button and a green button. You are allowed 10 seconds to review the code before rejecting or accepting & merging. Think fast.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is satire, right? Surely no one would put their name on that publicly?

    Like someone working in a kitchen boasting about a life hack of not wasting time with hygiene.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I include those preservative libraries in my projects. My code doesn’t go stale for a whole three weeks longer.