• breakfastburrito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fun fact: he wanted to study mice breeding but the church said no because it was lewd. If he had he probably wouldn’t have figured things out since mice genetics aren’t as simple as peas.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m wondering, how come studying mice breeding was considered lewd when humans had already been breeding a variety of livestock (and selecting traits at this) for thousands of years?

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine being the person in charge. You all are bound to celibacy, so you’ve seen and heard hushed tales of all kinds of …interesting side effects from living in that state for years.

      This guy walks in and makes his sales pitch. He wants to keep mice in the monestary. And have them get it on. Mostly under his personal observation. For science. Totally not some odd perversion, promise.

      I would have my doubts too!

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      He also kept bees in the monastery garden and tried to do experiments on them but it wasn’t known back then that bees mate high in the air, so his attempts to breed them were futile. Other monks were often stung or annoyed by the nasty bees so he quit beekeeping.

      Source: Mathematics of Life by Ian Stewart. I also visited his museum on Mendel Square, Brno.

      Once Upon a Time… The Discoverers ep. 16 also mentioned that the monks were annoyed at eating peas too often but I forgot to ask at the museum.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but he likely forged some data. Statistics show a high probability of his pea counts with a clear 3:1 phenome split being too good to be true.

      Source: Mathematics of Life by Ian Stewart. I also visited his museum on Mendel Square, Brno.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, his research was very sound by modern standards, mostly adhering to the scientific method. It would be very untimely 200 or more years prior. His paper (even in its original form!) is understandable by any modern intelligent person who can read German cursive.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    That sounds as if Darwin incorporated Mendel’s theory. He didn’t. It was much later that Mendel was rediscovered and combined with Darwinism