“We’ll get equity in return for it; get a good return for the American taxpayer, instead of just giving grants away”

  • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    As shitty as this admin is - that’s actually the right approach. Companies want govt money? Sure. Print some equity.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      The right approach would be to nationalize if you claim it has national security interests. Partial stake only incentivizes worst qualifies of capitalism.

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 days ago

        National security interests would drive the selection of certain companies. But all companies that need a bailout should do it in exchange for privileged stock. I’m tired of companies like ATT getting billions of dollars of free money for shit like “fiber infrastructure” and then just pocketting it. If they want that money, and if it is a matter of law, then they get uncle sam on the board telling them to spend it how it was meant to be spent.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          Bailouts are already conditional by law. Companies just break them and get fined cents for it. So clearly that’s not the solution.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          I have read much, much more than you on the topic, and the rest of their ideology amounts to it in fact if not exact phrasing.

          Like, seriously, just think about “Everything within the state” which is certainly not a disputed quote for one goddamn second.

          Further, you were quite literally too lazy to read the disclaimer in that very sentence so maybe just keep your ignorance to yourself.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            Considering you made the claim of “Fascism is the merging of the state and corporate power”, I highly doubt you have actually read much about fascism, especially when the term for that is “corporatism”.

            And I would argue, if you claim that “Everything within the state” backs up your claim, demonstrates how little you actually understand of fascism and totalitarian constructs.

            My point stands, you might wanna fact check yourself, because you clearly need to brush up on your poli-sci.

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                That is what fascism is or wants to do

                No, it isn’t, in fascism corporations are nothing but the organizational structures for the members of the state to direct control.

                The corporation is subservient to the ruling authoritarian, nothing more, any existence outside the totalitarian power structure is negated.