“Pretend is not an issue”? I’m making it the central issue, saying that is bad public transit, and therefore not a solution. That was me calling you out for strawmaning the discussion. Twice. You basically said “you want good public transit and less cars? You can’t have it because bad public transit requires cars.”
It’s a clutch for a public transit system that doesn’t serve the people. A park and ride is a symptom of a public transit that isn’t attending the population. It’s in no way, shape, or form an example of good transit.
“Pretend is not an issue”? I’m making it the central issue, saying that is bad public transit, and therefore not a solution. That was me calling you out for strawmaning the discussion. Twice. You basically said “you want good public transit and less cars? You can’t have it because bad public transit requires cars.”
Either discuss in good faith or I’m out.
Do you know what a park and ride is? Not everyone lives right next to public transit or is able to walk to it.
Also learn what a strawman is. Considering I never said any of what you claim.
It’s a clutch for a public transit system that doesn’t serve the people. A park and ride is a symptom of a public transit that isn’t attending the population. It’s in no way, shape, or form an example of good transit.