• GarytheSnail@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont get why people are mad about this. I’m happy that games are coming out that destroy top setups today because that means they will be beautiful (hopefully that’s what they are with max settings) with future hardware.

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re ugly looking now, that’s the issue. skylines 2 definitely is an improvement over 1, but it’s not an astronomical improvement (like the difference you’d notice with some franchises moving from unreal engine 4 to 5)

      The amount of raw performance needed to power this game is what’s shocking. It’s just a lack of optimisation.

      • hiddengoat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you even fucking know what that word “optimization” means, or do you just throw it around because Jim Sterling told you to?

    • LuckyBoy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is when the game is destroying top setups because its poorly optimized and full of bugs, and I dont think it was their idea to do a game for the future hardware because that would not be comercial viable.