• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The context is that the meme is making fun of it, which makes no sense for the epistemological version.

    • jaycifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The further context is that you posted this in the Philosophy community, which draws my mind more toward historical thinkers than modern groups that use “rational” to sound smart.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        plenty of modern philosophers. If you think philosophy is only about historical old men, that’s on you.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I can excuse the confusion, but I don’t get why people are defensive about it. is their self-worth tied to how well they identify philosophy schools?

        • jaycifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, I had a few modern philosophers as professors in college when I minored in it. Based on a glimpse at the wikipedia article you shared, I’m hesitant to call these modern rationalists philosophers. Sophists sounds more appropriate.

          I just thought there was some additional context that you missed which would explain the confusion some people are having. I will easily admit that it is my fault for thinking of historic philosophers whose ideas are still discussed today before a fringe group from Silicon Valley that uses the same terminology.