cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoNo Connection, No Flushlemmy.mlimagemessage-square334linkfedilinkarrow-up11.43Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1imageNo Connection, No Flushlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square334linkfedilink
minus-squarerekabis@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoWill have to look into that, thanks. One of my key implementation requirements, however, will be resiliency, which means simplicity will be a core feature. The more “moving parts”, the easier it will be to break.
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt’s not easy to make it any simpler. You’ve got to control those devices somehow.
Will have to look into that, thanks.
One of my key implementation requirements, however, will be resiliency, which means simplicity will be a core feature. The more “moving parts”, the easier it will be to break.
It’s not easy to make it any simpler. You’ve got to control those devices somehow.