Section 3 – Policy Initiatives & 2025 Deliverables
11. Democratic and Electoral Reform
The Parties will work together to create a special legislative all-party committee to evaluate and recommend policy and legislation measures to be pursued beginning in 2026 to increase democratic engagement & voter participation, address increasing political polarization, and improve the representativeness of government. The committee will review and consider preferred methods of proportional representation as part of its deliberations. The Government will work with the BCGC to establish the detailed terms of reference for this review, which are subject to the approval of both parties. The terms of reference will include the ability to receive expert and public input, provide for completion of the Special Committee’s work in Summer 2025, and public release of the Committee’s report within 45 days of completion. The committee will also review the administration of the 43rd provincial general election, including consideration of the Chief Electoral Officer’s report on the 43rd provincial general election, and make recommendations for future elections.
Sort of? That coalition still comes forward with a set of proposals that they generally have a chance to enact (or, they choose not to and bear the electoral consequences for it.) This is different than going forward with a set of proposals, then in a murky set of compromises behind close doors with multiple parties, some other result happens. How to assign blame or credit?
Come on. I don’t think a serious or well informed adult can honestly look at the PC party and say that it is seriously comparable to the Hard Right like the AfD. While some of those folks are swept up into a faction, their outcomes get moderated by the PC party because of the FPTP incentives to appeal to a broad swathe of the electorate.
I mean, you’ve seen this learning happen pretty quickly to the Liberal party. People got fed up about inflation and housing, started abandoning the party. There’s a reason the guy who crushed the Liberal party election was the only one who could credibly say he’d had nothing to do with those bad decisions.
Like, political parties aren’t only informed about public opinion during elections. (Otherwise, their campaign promises and platforms would just be wild guesses.) There’s all sorts of public opinion polling etc. And thanfully, we have a strong system that can address these issues instead of just muddle through with a coalition that’s too broad to actually address those issues.
Look at Germany. Does it seem likely that the coalition government will be able to do anything about the AfD or will they just muddle through while the problems fester and the AfD gets more popular? I’d put heavy money on the latter. Whereas Canada, has already started broad plans to create housing etc (these are the sorts of plans that take a long time to materialize, a sad irony about the upcoming election is that whatever party wins will likely be credited for dealing with housing developments spurred by the current Liberal government.)
I was referring to the federal PC party which no longer exists. First, the right-wing populist Reform Party split from it, then eventually the two merged again to form the current CPC party, with Stephen Harper from Reform becoming the leader and eventually PM of Canada. The PC party was unable to moderate its extreme elements and it ceased to exist.
I beg to differ. Housing was a serious problem when they came to power under Trudeau in 2015. They campaigned on doing something about it. They did nothing significant for 9 years and let the problem get worse and worse to the point where Ontario has 80000 homeless people today.
People only abandoned the LPC when things got so bad they thought the CPC may do something even though they’d be worse in many other respects. Many people don’t even try voting third or fourth party because they have experiences with their votes being lost due to FPTP. Instead they keep voting for the ineffectual party they prefer till some issue gets so bad that it seems the party worse for them might do better on that issue.
What we just witnessed with the replacement of the LPC leader without an election is pretty unprecedented and exceptional. This is not how things typically work. Normally the LPC would have stayed the course, lost the next election, have the CPC for 4-8 years and maybe then have a changed LPC that has learned a lesson and ready to do something about housing. Meanwhile the CPC would have let the problem get even worse as their policies are also ineffectual in that regard.
Finally, I also believe the AfD will grow but I think there’s a chance for De Linke to grow with it and force the next-next government to do something about the issues AfD voters are facing.