• Chriskmee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You have no idea what you are talking about… profits aren’t theft, paying people less than the money you make from their work also isn’t theft. Being worth billions because the stock market values your ownership in a big company as worth billions also isn’t theft.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      paying people less than the money you make from their work also isn’t theft

      Why would someone agree to sell their labor for less than it’s worth thonk

      • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What you are worth is less than the profit you make. If a company paid you exactly the money they made from you, they would make no money and cease to exist. It’s really not that complicated.

        It’s like asking why do stores sell products for more than it costs them to buy. It’s such a simple question that even you should know the right answer.

          • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because that’s the only way it will work? How do you expect businesses to exist and pay bills when they make zero money?

              • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So we should just sell items for what they cost? Doesn’t matter if you spent all day working, you get nothing because you just sold everything for what it costs? That’s a better society?

                Businesses first need to pay employees, that’s an obvious one, nobody is going to work for free. Then they need to pay for all the raw materials they buy, and the electricity, etc. If they can’t make a profit they aren’t paying any of those.

    • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that you willingly debase yourself like this says everything that is needed to know about the system we live under.

      You are better than this.

      • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Explain where I am debasing myself? If you are referring to a company paying me less than they make from me, how do you expect them to make any money, or even break even, if they don’t do that?

        • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you are referring to a company paying me less than they make from me, how do you expect them to make any money, or even break even, if they don’t do that?

          • Karl Marx, Das Kapital
            • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re pointing out the fundamental contradiction of capitalism - bosses make a profit by paying workers less than their value - that is the basis of Marxism. We are all extremely aware that your boss needs to underpay you to “make any money, or even break even”. It is literally the reason we oppose capitalism.

              • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you propose they pay you exactly the amount you make them, and the company goes broke in the process, so now you also make nothing since you don’t have a job?

                • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, we propose that there not be a group of people (capitalists) who own the business just so they can extract profit from the worker’s labor. The workers should collectively own the firm. We recognize that there are two primary classes in society: those who work for a wage that is less than the value they generate (the working class) and those who own a business and extract profit by underpaying their workers (the capitalist class). These classes are inherently in conflict, and the only resolution to that is socialism, which removes the capitalist class from the equation entirely.

                  • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So the people who put in the most risk and started the company get nothing more than someone who joined 20 years later? How do you expect companies to get created if the owner constantly loses more and more of their company the bigger it gets? Why risk any of this money in the company when it isn’t even his anymore?

      • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You realize rich people do pay income taxes just like the rest of us, right?

          • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They do actually, the problem is that when people talk about their tax rate they compare it to wealth, not income, and that isn’t how income tax works.