Release v1.0.0 · ghostty-org/ghostty
github.com
v1.0.0
  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    8·
    10 hours ago

    Looked at it, interesting, no package, installed cosmic-term instead

    Uses alacritty under the hood, with tabs and tiles!

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    11·
    11 hours ago

    Looking at ghostty-git in AUR, zig is built on haskell? With 221 haskell libraries.

    And what does it need pandoc-cli and hslua-cli for?

  • Zucca@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    6·
    12 hours ago

    Hm… I don’t see it stating anything about wayland, but since it says “native” in some many places, I need to assume it won’t use Xwayland, unless specifically told to.

    Right? Anyone to confirm?

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    296·
    17 hours ago

    It’s ridiculous how much time people are spending performance optimizing terminals.

    xterm on a 120MHz Pentium on X11 in the 90s performed “fine”.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      1·
      2 hours ago

      Sure, it performed “fine”.

      But it was sluggish compared to the VGA ttys we were used to.

      Now, if we can have something as snappy and at the same time as pretty as Eterm… 👌

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      2·
      2 hours ago

      The problem with xterm is that everything else about it sucks. The only other half-decent performer is mlterm which is decent but has its share of issues.

      This one feels quite snappy; better than foot.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      3·
      5 hours ago

      Every Linux user has the earliest and lowest specced version of the 4k Lenovo thinkpad from back when 4k on a laptop was impractical and a stupid idea.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      33·
      14 hours ago

      Assuming you had a pretty decent monitor and graphics output in the 90s, it may have been 800x600, but more likely 640x480, and you’d have been using the standard issue bitmap font with no anti-aliasing, blitted to screen using software rendering. Probably in a single colour, too.

      Alas, the problem with that is that it doesn’t scale. On xterm a 4K monitor, I can watch Vim redrawing the screen, paging through logs is painful. Use Kitty for the same, it’s instant, I can flip through tabs and split screens too, and have niceties like anti-aliased fonts and transparency if I want them.

      Some people spend a lot of time in the terminal, so I can’t fault them for taking the time to make a nice working environment and sharing that work with others.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        61·
        8 hours ago

        “decent” hardware back then ran at 1024x768. I never ran less. And definitely multiple colors. But sure - no anti-aliasing and other features. But also on hardware several orders of magnitude slower.

        Though granted I don’t have a 4k monitor so maybe there are issues with that…

        Some people spend a lot of time in the terminal, so I can’t fault them for taking the time to make a nice working environment and sharing that work with others.

        I mean - it’s the first thing I open… Which is why I’m surprised others seem to have “performance issues” since I’ve never seen any.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      3·
      8 hours ago

      The “Abandon all hope, ye who enter here” terminal?

      Edit: that was once a comment in the sourcecode.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        4·
        8 hours ago

        Hah! It’s funny I just fired it up again for the first time and I do see a bit of flicker in xterm when paging full-screened in vim… So maybe there is something to performance optimizing terminals. :-)

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      1·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, it’s a terminal emulator; what’s it supposed to show, a bunch of white text on black background?

      • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
        1·
        7 minutes ago

        It supposedly supports fancy features, so I’m curious to see how those look, they also say it’s got top of the line speed, so maybe a screencast with side by side of reference terminal emulator (xterm?) and ghostty displaying heavy throughput output to see the smoothness goodness

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      293·
      20 hours ago

      If you’re occasionally using them, there aren’t any.

      If you’re excessively using them, there are many.

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          22·
          11 hours ago

          Sure, I can do that.

          • If you’re looking for something lightweight, go for st or urxvt. These are Xorg-only.
          • If you want to configure it via GUI, xfce4-terminal is the middle ground for lightweight and feature-rich. If you are on KDE, konsole would suffice. You can use these on Xorg and Wayland.
          • If you want to work with multiple panes in a single window, terminator is your friend. Used this on Xorg but not sure about its Wayland compatibility.
          • If you want GPU acceleration and more features, kitty and alacritty is out there. Both should work on Xorg and Wayland.
          • If you want something like st but pure Wayland, foot is the best lightweight terminal emulator. My current personal favourite.
          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            8·
            9 hours ago

            Fucking legend!

            Pretty sure I’m using konsole right now, whatever it is, it came pre-installed on my distro.
            Might check out foot and kitty, what I’m using is working right now, but always nice to look into different options.

            • muhyb@programming.dev
              2·
              7 hours ago

              Yeah, it’s one of the greatest characteristics of FOSS. We have many options and endless posibilities.

              Glad to help.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    151·
    1 day ago

    Hacker news users seem happy with its performance, so will try tomorrow. Fun with new terminals.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      5·
      17 hours ago

      Is there a difference in performance between terminals? Holy hell

      Edit: i always used byobu btw

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    2·
    16 hours ago

    But does it roll down like Yakuake did before I updated Fedora and broke it? :( That’s all I want.

    • Zucca@sopuli.xyz
      3·
      12 hours ago

      I’ve been a foot user for quite some time now. However, this seems interesting.

      • SmokeInFog@midwest.socialEnglish
        6·
        1 day ago

        I <3 kitty, will probably give this a look but I’ve got kitty so well tuned to my liking at this point it’s hard for me to imagine switching

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          3·
          19 hours ago

          Have got kitty and xterm looking identical, multiplexing is done by zellij anyway

          I think kitty is a bit snappier but honestly you could switch one out for the other and I probably wouldn’t notice

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      18·
      20 hours ago

      I was very satisfied with Bash for a long time until my friend got me using Zsh. I still am not sure i need Zsh over Bash honestly. Command autocomplete is obnoxious

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        5·
        13 hours ago

        Different things. Bash/Zsh/Fish/Nu are shells, i.e. a low level CLI interface with the computer. On systems with graphics you need a graphical program to display the shell, e.g Konsole/Gnome-shell/Alacritty. Also there’s a third (optional) program to render the line where you type commands differently, this is called a prompt and there are several different ones, e.g. Powerlevel10k/oh-my-posh/Starship.

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        4·
        19 hours ago

        I don’t know that anyone “needs” anything more than bash. It’s the creature comforts that sell the other shells. That said, bash has never hung or crashed on me. I can’t say the same for zsh.

    • Crestwave@lemmy.world
      11·
      19 hours ago

      It’s incredibly fast, has the features you would want like tabs/splits, maintains comprehensive compatibility, and is written cleanly in Zig. What’s not to like?

      • brie@programming.devEnglish
        166·
        18 hours ago

        I’ve never seen a slow terminal emulator. Most terminals have tabs and splits. Never experienced compatibility issues. Don’t care about Zig at all.

        Are these all the reasons? Another toy software written out of boredom.

        • Crestwave@lemmy.world
          161·
          17 hours ago

          Most terminal emulators are in fact slow and they can be a huge bottleneck if you run complex TUIs or workloads that print a lot of output.

          Ever written a program that was extremely slow only for it to run instantly after removing your debug print statements? That’s because your terminal is slow.

          Fast terminal emulators already exist, but they notably refused to add tabs/splits and overall tended to be quite janky. Ghostty merging these features may not be the most groundbreaking innovation, but a high quality piece of software that can drop-in replace something you use daily with some cool improvements is something to be excited about to me. :-)

          • brie@programming.devEnglish
            6·
            17 hours ago

            Thanks, this clears things up. I didn’t know what exactly was making print IO slow.

            I don’t use any complex TUIs. Pretty much everything is CLI or GUI. Which TUIs did you have in mind that were slow?

            I’d like to test this soon. I’ll look for a modern TUI framework.