• Tezka@lemmy.todayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Human communication is non-verbal; body-language, tone of voice, facial expression, eye contact and movement, gaze, presence. Why write, say anything, when one can show an image, point, or just look, knowing the Other is attentive, curious and interested in communication.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why write, say anything, when one can show an image, point, or just look

      A picture is worth a thousand words, sure. But generating a complex and nuanced image is often far more technically difficult than producing equivalent text.

      There is a lot of information that can potentially be lost in an image, while a block of technical writing is easier to parse and cite.

      • Tezka@lemmy.todayOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Human visual processing is extremely low resolution. 8-bit, if I remember correctly. What you’re imagining has to do with imagination, not vision or sufficient comprehension for communication. This is a matter of competency and ability; generating an image, producing equivalent text, parsing, citing, don’t you think? Systems need to be image-generators, or text generators; image-interpreters, text interpreters… Perhaps examine the taxonomy of AI.