this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
342 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
58 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    342
    "The US Government Has a Microsoft Problem" (lemmy.world)
    submitted 6 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    https://www.wired.com/story/the-us-government-has-a-microsoft-problem/

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    US government does not have a public fund or tax to pay for the development of a government sanctioned Unix/GNU operating system by a US company. Once that happens, then this issue goes away.

    [–] mansfield@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    redhat is just sitting right there.... waiting,

    [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Well, it was. It's not the reliable, stable OS it was only a few years ago. It has really pushed the envelope for stupid since its first foray into Dumb for EL6.

    [–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Yeah. This irks me even more because the US Gov:

    A. Has laws that could have prevented IBM from buying RedHat.

    B. Knows it relies on RedHat for securing critical systems.

    C. Didn't do shit about the purchase.

    Ideally, each government would look out for the public's interest, in these things. But in this case, it failed to even look out for it's own interests (which would have aligned, in this case).

    [–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    US Government: “Anti-trust? Pfft, keep that ~~bribery~~ lobbying train coming and we will absolutely trust you.”

    The Public: That’s not what “trust” means… oh…

    [–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

    "We stopped applying antitrust laws because they were hurting trust in corporations"

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

    You are assuming the various departments talk. It is kind of a love hate relationship.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

    Not the greatest company to work with

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago

    In reality it is more complex. However, I know the air force uses a ton of Linux and related tools such as Kubernetes and Samba. Who would've thought a fighter jet would be running kubernetes