Anne-Geneviève Bütikofer, director of the Swiss Hospital Association, H+, is opening the door to a single health insurance scheme. “The pressure is so great that a revolution seems inevitable,” she says.

A single health insurer may not be the right solution, “but it’s worth considering”, said Anne-Geneviève Bütikofer in an interview with Swiss newspaper Sonntags Blick on Sunday.

“If 2.5 million people change health insurer every year, at a cost of CHF800 ($882) to CHF1,000 per change, we have already found our potential savings of several billion. The discussions surrounding the single health insurance scheme are therefore legitimate,” she said. Higher hospital charges

Despite the high cost of healthcare for the population, “we are calling for a 5% increase in all hospital charges”, says Anne-Geneviève Bütikofer. "The rise in prices must finally be taken into account.”

According to the director, however, these increases should not be reflected in health insurance premiums. “I wonder whether we are financing the right things in the system with the right sources of funding.”

“Today, all hospital services are funded by compulsory health insurance,” she adds, stressing that there are no additional sources of remuneration for new expenditure.

  • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Curious if anyone here would care to educate on American on how the Swiss healthcare system works currently? I assume there’s universal coverage already, but I don’t know how it works.

    • restlessyet@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Insurance is privatized with many providers, however the ‘base insurance’ covers the same at all providers and is mandatory to have for all residents. However base insurance prices still vary between providers every year, so people are encouraged to switch the provider regularily, which is a business on its own with brokers / call centers getting bonuses for every ‘sign up’, which means a lot of wasted money:

      https://www.emolument.com/salary-reports/jobs/insurance-broker/45892

      • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds like what the US tried to do with the individual mandate when the ACA (Obamacare) went through. Honestly, I’m surprised. I didn’t realize there were systems like that in Europe. I thought pretty much everywhere there had nationalized healthcare.

        • P1r4nha@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it’s similar to that, but with more regulated negotation and price controls.

        • enthusiasticamoeba@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was also surprised when I moved to the Netherlands. Healthcare and insurance work exactly like they do in the US, with private insurance, copays, deductibles, additional plans for dental/vision… The differences are that the prices of everything are much, much lower.

    • Akisamb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another aspect is that price negotiation for medecine is done done by the government. This is different from the USA where even Medicare doesn’t have the right to negotiate it’s price’s.

      Private insurers also get some of their insured redistributed between them by the government so that one insurer doesn’t take all the expensive cases.