• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    7 months ago

    “The communist states are getting earthquakes. Look at California. You can’t have more earthquakes than California. You want to figure out why?”

    Californian here, the answer is “plate tectonics”, and “fault lines”.

    Source: I graduated the third grade.

    • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      That is still one of the most surreal moments to come out of that whole mess.

      I just don’t understand how it was allowed to play out. At some point, someone had to decide that going ahead with it was more important than waiting a day and finding a suitable location.

      For the life of me I can’t remember what the press conference was about, only the screw up.

      • Vox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Extreme ego and narcissism allowed that to happen. It was a simple mistake in booking that they refused to own up to because that would be admitting mistake which is something fascist leaders are completely unable to cope with

  • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Well by this logic, hurricanes and tornadoes must be targeting republican states. What’s the message being sent there? 🤔 At least you can somewhat design and build architecture against earthquakes…

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve noticed that people from tornado states are most afraid of earthquakes. Makes me think they believe that an earthquake is scarier than a tornado. The amount of fear I see suggests that tornado’s must be terrifying to live through.

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I agree, but I guess it has to do with their relative unpredictability (as far as I understand). Hurricanes you can prepare for days in advance. And at least tornado’s you can ‘see them coming’ to the point where if you’re unlucky you might lose your house, but not your life. Not sure how the numbers back that up (or if they can even be compared), but emotionally that feels like the answer.

        • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Funnily enough, looking at the stats for the US from 2020 onwards to now (averaged to annual data), 272 deaths per year were caused by Storms, 63 by extreme temperatures, 56 by wildfires, and only 0.5 (so in the last 4 years only about 2 people) by earthquakes. source

          So statistically, they should be more afraid of hurricanes and tornadoes (But to be fair, the odds of dying to these are extremely low to begin with, car accidents are probably far more common)

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tornadoes don’t really affect large areas like earthquakes do. It might wipe out a neighborhood, but that’s usually about it. Very few people actually die from them.

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love how this dried up old dipshit had it made in the shade after 911 but these maga dumbasses can’t let their little glue sniffing brains feel like the spotlight isn’t on them anymore. The world will be a better place once this idiot is behind bars or dead…or both.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, and witches cursed my pants to not fit anymore. NOT all the non-stop sitting and snacking. Definitely witches.

      • HopingForBetter@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I really just wonder how easy it would be, psychologically, to start a Red-Blooded for Jesus organization, rake in profits under a non-profit tag, then “have to close because of the economy” and retire.

        • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m on board. We make some up some bs but close enough Biblical quotes and bad AI images, put them on t-shirts and flags, charge too much. Couple that with a poorly produced podcast. Tell them that we “support” (in really vague terms) a variety of groups (that we have made up) and infer that monthly subscriptions will help stop communism and wokeness - again couched in vague terms.

          Of course, it’s a for-profit corporation. Jesus specifically said that getting a high ROI is divine.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Depends on which tier of republican you’re referring to. People like Trump and Giuliani are defective in the sense that they’ll happily lie through their teeth for personal gain without that pesky conscience getting in the way.

      The voting base is defective in that they have no critical thinking skills to see through these obvious lies.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Different priorities. If your goal is to see your stock portfolio go up and ignore everything else, voting republican makes sense because that’s their goal too.

      Not saying it’s right but that’s what it is.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Definitely not facts

          Usually republicans make things go up for a while, then they pass a bunch of stupid shit, destabilize the economy and cause a crash for democrats to clean up.

          It’s more about control of congress than anything else, the president doesn’t have a huge impact on stock prices on the whole

          • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            If you are comparing the orange traitor to Brandon (not sure that’s what you’re intimating), consider both data points at the same time in their presidential trajectories.

    • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      Communism is when you… Wait okay let me start over. If someone else is doing something and… Hold on. So you know how theres capitalism and then there’s… Please don’t do a communism.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It means any place where total oligarchy is resisted in any way whatsoever.

      It sounds like a stupid comment to rally the hogs, but in reality these types of things are a mask-off moment.

      “We hate it when people attempt to better their lives because it threatens our wealth”

      EDIT: I mean yes, it’s all those other things too. America’s Mayor would, be definition, have to be a dumbass bootlicking yes man who swindles for votes AND also be a fascist culture-warring capital defender.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    Look at California. You can’t have more earthquakes than California. You want to figure out why?"

    I think they’re called fault lines. This is on the level of “tides go in, tides go out, you can’t explain that!” Followed by an “are you fucking kidding?” face