• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah the whole thing is kinda dumb on both ends. From the employees perspective it’s ridiculous to allow the company have any level of control over a device they own. From the company’s perspective, why would you want to allow access and/or have information that’s the company’s property on a device the company doesn’t own?

    If I have a password for key company infrastructure stored on my personal phone, then the company fires me… well that seems like a problem a company would want to avoid. It could happen in any scenario, but significantly less likely if I have to turn in my company phone when my employment ends.

    But hey the company saves a few bucks on buying phones and that helps the quarterly profits I guess.

    • Dreadnaught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      So with MDM, the company can essentially wipe that device remotely in the case that something like that occurs. Not that it’s the best option. Still think companies should just provide the hardware. But that’s the protection in that case.