• ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Planned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California?

    400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people

      • xeekei@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        definitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.

  • arymandias@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think this empty stretch of land would qualify as a city in any sensible definition. But sure third largest.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its not third largest because its empty land, otherwise other neighboring cities like tehachapi and Tejon ranch would have it beat. They call it thurd largest because they have designated streets with names that have nobody living on it.

  • ZeroCooler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    We used to go camping in the California City desert all the time. It is super weird seeing cul-de-sacs and street signs with nothing but dirt.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I drove through once to check it out.

    It’s a weird-ass place. Like someone took a small desert town and stretched it over miles of empty scrubland.