• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The worst thing is that Starmer will inevitably adopt this as a “common sense” proposal to avoid being wedged/looking like some kind of Corbynite leftist.

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In healthcare it’s perfectly reasonable to use sex-specific language. There’s sex-specific care, after all.

    • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but sex and gender are different things. Our government is planning to ban transgender women from female wards, for example.

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m about to ask an incredibly stupid question here but…what are female wards? Are, say, hospital floors divided by gender in your country? I am unfamiliar with doing that as a concept. I suppose the only sex/gender specific area of a hospital I know of is the labor and delivery department but it’s because it involves people with a uterus delivering a baby.

          • dingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I already mentioned that. You wouldn’t see anyone banning people from those wards. It’s literally just for people with a uterus, no matter the gender. So it doesn’t make sense to say transgender women would be banned from the maternity ward. If a person is having a baby then they are having a baby. I am trying to understand the comment that I replied to.